The advantage of analysing statistics is that you get to fiddle with the numbers Pigro. The top four responses could almost amount to the same thing in differing variations anyway. The problem, as this is a "closed" poll, is that we cannot see who voted where, or how many of the multiple choices were selected by each voter. So, it could be that every one of the 29 voters in favour of an "online community" voted on that section and possibly only some of the same 29 voted only on one other section of the multiple choice. Only 16 from the total amount of 45 voters didn't cast a single vote on that particular section and possibly more than one person voted in all sections in an attempt to skew this highly scientific poll or perhaps we really do have 6.67% of voters who are from the Guardia di Finanza!
Then of course, there is Alan, who may not fit into any category and may not have voted at all, but could only be expressing his concern about the lack of relevant sections for every possibility of every voter within a 6,000+ membership who all have the same voting abilities should they choose to vote before this poll closes, which is probably sometime in the future and could already be advertised somewhere with the possibility that I simply did not see it. Far too many variables as far as I'm concerned and it's probably easier just to look on my post as a way of contributing to the community by bumping the thread.
