Quote:
Originally Posted by barn_elms
Once again you're reading slightly more into what I have said than actually exists. My apology was for the humour or lack of it in the mention of a fictional Society. In fact if I'd known that you held the following view, found in one of your posts, I'm not sure whether I would have been quite so charitable.
|
Thank you Barn-Elms, I am flattered that you have searched back through over a years worth of posts to find something to quote out of context.
Here is the full post, the content of which I feel is balanced and which I am happy to stand by.
QUOTE=Nielo;63292]Thank you Manopello, your post shows both sides of the divide.
Who is to blame if someone buys a house without even bothering to see it?
Agents have a duty of care but then again so do buyers. If, a few months down the line the buyers discover some (almost inevitable) nasties, they will no doubt blame the agent.
Don't get me wrong, I know there are dodgy agents out here (well everywhere) and I would never stick up for them or their sharp practises, and I know some people come unstuck even after exercising due care and diligence but it is also true that a fool and his money are easily parted.
Some agents give the whole profession a bad name and some buyers give all buyers a bad name.
If these discussions make the buyers more aware, then it should make it more difficult for agents to get away with the sorts of scams described here and everyone will be better off for it.[/quote]
I neither need nor want your charity so I will bow out now and let this thread get back on topic. Good luck Estherina34 and sorry for taking the thread off topic.