ITALY Magazine

ITALYForums


These forums are closed to posting - join us in the new ITALY Community

Click here to join the new community now


Go Back   Italy Magazine Forums > Discuss Italy - Benvenuti in Italia > Travel & Holiday Advice

Travel & Holiday Advice Where to go, how to get there and, most importantly, why you should go there. From Aosta in the North to Zafferana Etna in the South of Sicily someone is sure to be able to suggest something.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 09-05-09, 10:28 PM
Patrician
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,315
Thanks: 710
Thanked 709 Times in 413 Posts
Default Tunnels

This idea of a route avoiding tunnels is not at all frivolous. It is pretty important to motorcycle riders, who have every reason for not wishing to challenge their lungs with 22kms worth of toxic fumes (eg. the San Gottardo).

It's also relevant to people riding vintage machines, which are not required to carry lights (and which therefore could be considered illegal in tunnels - quite apart from the question of the mental health of people riding through even a short unlit tunnel on an unlighted bike.)

There are also drivers, or passengers, who cannot stand driving in tunnels - maybe because of bad eyesight, or claustrophobia. There are others who cannot bear to drive on roads with big viaducts.

So, for me, the query of a Rome/Ancona route tunnel free was perfectly interesting. It isn't something you can easily check on a route map - and though I'd got most of the way there - (I can do the E45 Orte/Val Fabbrica avoiding tunnels, 'cos I needed to in the past) - I was working on how to avoid some of the north of Rome short tunnels on the A1 when the original thread got deleted, so I didn't follow through on some of the new roads (with tunnels) between Val Fabbrica and Ancona.

Driving without using tunnels or viaducts is a fascinating way of route planning: akin to designing a walking or cycling trip! Not irrelevant at all.
Reply With Quote
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to Charles Phillips For This Useful Post:
Jinty (09-05-09), Lollita (09-05-09), Mediated Anarchist (10-05-09), Nielo (09-05-09), Roskoboy (10-05-09), Torchiarolan (09-05-09)
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 09-05-09, 10:35 PM
Patrician
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 512
Thanks: 441
Thanked 362 Times in 187 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Charles Phillips View Post
This idea of a route avoiding tunnels is not at all frivolous. It is pretty important to motorcycle riders, who have every reason for not wishing to challenge their lungs with 22kms worth of toxic fumes (eg. the San Gottardo).

It's also relevant to people riding vintage machines, which are not required to carry lights (and which therefore could be considered illegal in tunnels - quite apart from the question of the mental health of people riding through even a short unlit tunnel on an unlighted bike.)

There are also drivers, or passengers, who cannot stand driving in tunnels - maybe because of bad eyesight, or claustrophobia. There are others who cannot bear to drive on roads with big viaducts.

So, for me, the query of a Rome/Ancona route tunnel free was perfectly interesting. It isn't something you can easily check on a route map - and though I'd got most of the way there - (I can do the E45 Orte/Val Fabbrica avoiding tunnels, 'cos I needed to in the past) - I was working on how to avoid some of the north of Rome short tunnels on the A1 when the original thread got deleted, so I didn't follow through on some of the new roads (with tunnels) between Val Fabbrica and Ancona.

Driving without using tunnels or viaducts is a fascinating way of route planning: akin to designing a walking or cycling trip! Not irrelevant at all.
Words of wisdom, intelligence and common sense, you should be a moderator Charles, and no, I am not being flippant. The ability to distinguish between what should and should not be moderated is the job of a moderator, otherwise the position can no longer be described as that of a moderator but rather that of a censor.
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Torchiarolan For This Useful Post:
Lollita (09-05-09), Roskoboy (10-05-09)
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 10-05-09, 12:25 AM
Patrician
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 649
Thanks: 7
Thanked 100 Times in 67 Posts
Default

Not at all frivolous, but I think the ventilation of tunnels is a lot better than it used to be. I'd also rather not share roads with an unlit bike or anybody who can't cope with tunnels or viaducts ! Used to have an MZ which might as well have been unlit for all the efficiency of it's headlight and my riding at night used to be a LOT slower!
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 10-05-09, 09:03 PM
Equestrian
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 20
Thanks: 1
Thanked 5 Times in 5 Posts
Default

All good points Charles. That said, the ventilation in any car is provided from the air outside so we all suffer in tunnels in the same way that motorcyclists do - perhaps just not so obviously.

I didn't even see the thread mentioned - why was it deleted?
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 10-05-09, 10:07 PM
Patrician
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: On the side of a hill
Posts: 2,395
Thanks: 726
Thanked 1,146 Times in 600 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by EddieV View Post
All good points Charles. That said, the ventilation in any car is provided from the air outside so we all suffer in tunnels in the same way that motorcyclists do - perhaps just not so obviously.

I didn't even see the thread mentioned - why was it deleted?

That is a question many of us have been asking. So far no satisfactory reason has been forthcoming.

Try addressing your question directly to Marc, the moderator who deleted it. You might have better luck than I have had.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 11-05-09, 05:20 PM
Equestrian
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Abruzzo
Posts: 40
Thanks: 22
Thanked 17 Times in 9 Posts
Default

I saw this report recently:-

Italy’s tunnels are the most dangerous in Europe, a report released Monday said.
According to the report by Automobile Club ACI and roads agency ANAS, the result of controls run on 22 Italian tunnels so far showed a “critical scenario”, only one of three met safety standards, compared to eight out of 10 in the rest of Europe.

The report said 78 percent of Italian tunnels are hazardous compared to 36 percent in other European countries.

Lack of security in the tunnels is mainly attributable to inefficient fire and ventilation systems, badly identified escape tunnels, poorly managed traffic flows, missing traffic lights and ineffective management in case of emergencies.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 11-05-09, 07:16 PM
Senator
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Cambs/near Rome
Posts: 284
Thanks: 46
Thanked 37 Times in 30 Posts
Default

not to mention junctions INSIDE tunnels. Up near Genoa we were driving along when someone shot out from the right inside the tunnel. Fortunately I had no one on the outside so i was able to move over. Still remember this over ten years later and I drive regularly round Rome and Naples
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 11-05-09, 08:03 PM
Patrician
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,315
Thanks: 710
Thanked 709 Times in 413 Posts
Default

Going by the above posts there are more reasons to design tunnel free routes than I had ever considered, but the most compelling argument against Italian tunnels is that they don't have a view.

Think about it - tunnels go through the high bits of mountains, so you miss the spectacular panorama from thousands of metres altitude: alternatively they cut off wiggly bits of coastline so you miss the azure coves and the fishermen with their buckets by the side of the road. If you aren't in a rush, using any tunnel longer than about 3km is bound to have deprived you of some wonderful experiences!

Viaducts, on the other hand, are quite the opposite - I hunt these down for (...err, passengers...) quite fantastic views and a new perspective on the world.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Charles Phillips For This Useful Post:
Torchiarolan (12-05-09)
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 14-05-09, 06:37 PM
Senator
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 210
Thanks: 0
Thanked 11 Times in 4 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Charles Phillips View Post
Going by the above posts there are more reasons to design tunnel free routes than I had ever considered, but the most compelling argument against Italian tunnels is that they don't have a view.

Think about it - tunnels go through the high bits of mountains, so you miss the spectacular panorama from thousands of metres altitude: alternatively they cut off wiggly bits of coastline so you miss the azure coves and the fishermen with their buckets by the side of the road. If you aren't in a rush, using any tunnel longer than about 3km is bound to have deprived you of some wonderful experiences!

Viaducts, on the other hand, are quite the opposite - I hunt these down for (...err, passengers...) quite fantastic views and a new perspective on the world.

Lots of tunnels on the way down to Puglia on the A14, particularly in Abruzzo....very fast and very dangerous....Treat them with the utmost respect if you want to live! There are one or 2 particularly spectacular bridges too which are about a mile long and very high up. Lovely views from them but again you wont see much if you are the driver as you will be concentrating on getting across in one piece.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:13 PM.